|
·         stressing that caregiving excellence drives profitability, not vice versa
Â
·         making company decisions based upon the inspiration that drew them to elder care
Â
·         recognizing that a company's reputation is earned one facility at a time, and that the collective achievements of many over time can be tarnished overnight by a few   Â
Â
·         treating facility staff with equal reverence in organizations in which nursing homes are not the major source of income
Â
·         placing proven management talent within the facility and streamlining corporate operations
Â
·         structuring lines of accountability where nursing directors, business office staff, and facility-based managers report to the administrator only, and the administrator reports to one corporate executive. Solving management problems at the facility level, rather than micro-managing day-to-day operations from afar
Â
·         hiring facility-based clinical talent (i.e., therapy, dietetics, social services, and recreation) whenever possible, rather than rationing these services from independent contractors
Â
·         granting facility management the autonomy to influence the destiny of their operation
Â
·         de-emphasizing one-size-fits-all, per-patient-day decision making, and cookie-cutter approaches to caregiving
Â
·         designing staffing levels based on periodic caregiving studies and resident outcomes, not regulatory (survey) tolerance
Â
·         enabling facility management to hire, schedule and retain quality personnel
Â
·         structuring employee wage and benefit programs to foster longevity
Â
·         promoting facility and corporate talent from within the organization
Â
·         approaching staff education as a wise investment, not a cursory compliance exercise
Â
·         communicating business challenges to company employees on a timely basis
Â
·         making periodic facility appearances to interact with residents and front-line staff.Â
Â
·         funding sufficient levels of facility supplies and replacing worn out equipment and furnishings before they become problematic
Â
·         making timely repairs and improvements to the physical plant, including periodic renovation and cosmetic upgrades.
Â
·         achieving a bottom line by exhausting revenue opportunities and culling non-essential company resources before slashing caregiving expenses (i.e., labor hours, benefits)
Â
·         designing facility budgets with realistic, attainable benchmarks
Â
·         reinforcing caregiving expectations through a variety of communication vehicles, while recognizing that spoken words and actions carry more meaning than words on paper
Â
·         rewarding facility employees for their caregiving contributions from a corporate platform
Â
·         designing executive bonus plans that do not undermine caregiving excellence
Â
·         promoting the philosophy that corporate offices are designed to support facility operations, not vice versa
Â
·         posturing corporate field staff to serve as company mentors and facilitators, not enforcers
Â
·         scrutinizing the bureaucratic paper trail between corporate offices and facilities
Â
·         ensuring that resident representatives receive an accurate and timely accounting of facility charges, whether generated by facility staff or third parties
Â
·         reminding corporate staff that the era of order taking has passed. Census development is now determined by competition; competition is determined by caregiving excellence and caregiving excellence is determined by company executives.
Â
·         remembering that facility employees are the instrument of a company cause
Â
·         not conceding a "cause" to defeat due to government reimbursement challengesÂ
Â
·         possessing the business wisdom and perseverance for a facility to remain prosperous
Â
·         being forthright with facility staff about business decisions affecting their employment
Â
·         treating each facility as a unique caregiving community, not as a link in a chain  Â
   Â
·         Recognizing the far reaching ripple effect of adverse facility decisions to residents and staff, their families and friends, facility business relationships, and the surrounding community.
Â
Â
 |